@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ After passing the pass 1 and 2 snow tests, some pixels that were originally mark
\hline
Parameter & Description & Name in the configuration file & Default value\\
\hline
\textcolor{red}{$r_f$}& Resize factor to produce the down-sampled red band &\texttt{rRed\_backtocloud}& 0.100\\
\textcolor{red}{$r_f$}& Resize factor to produce the down-sampled red band &\texttt{rf}& 8 for L8 (12 for S2)\\
\textcolor{red}{$r_D$}& Maximum value of the down-sampled red band reflectance to define a dark cloud pixel &\texttt{rRed\_darkcloud}& 0.650 \\
\textcolor{red}{$n_1$}& Minimum value of the NDSI for the pass 1 snow test &\texttt{ndsi\_pass1}& 0.400\\
\textcolor{red}{$n_2$}& Minimum value of the NDSI for the pass 2 snow test &\texttt{ndsi\_pass2}& 0.150\\
...
...
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ The implementation of the Sentinel-2 configuration was tested on the Sentinel-2A
\label{fig:S2snowzoom}
\end{figure}
The output of LIS was also examined by comparing the output snow mask from two images acquired on the same day by two different sensors. The example shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:L8vS4} illustrates that both snow masks are consistent, although further inspection revealed that the SPOT-4 snow mask tends to underestimate the snow cover area in this case. This is probably due to the lower radiometric resolution of SPOT-4 sensor.
The output of LIS was also examined by comparing the output snow mask from two images acquired on the same day by two different sensors. The example shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:L8vsS4-23042013} illustrates that both snow masks are consistent, although further inspection revealed that the SPOT-4 snow mask tends to underestimate the snow cover area in this case. This is probably due to the lower radiometric resolution of SPOT-4 sensor.
